<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Control Freaks Need Not Apply</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/02/control-freaks-need-not-apply.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/02/control-freaks-need-not-apply.html</link>
	<description>A discussion of knowledge management that goes above and beyond technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 17:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ????</title>
		<link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/02/control-freaks-need-not-apply.html/comment-page-1#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 03:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/?p=569#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Anyone else think the same?  Got me thinking after reading this, thx man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else think the same?  Got me thinking after reading this, thx man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Control Freaks Need Not Apply « UBC Digital Literacy Centre</title>
		<link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/02/control-freaks-need-not-apply.html/comment-page-1#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Control Freaks Need Not Apply « UBC Digital Literacy Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/?p=569#comment-556</guid>
		<description>[...] Above and Beyond KM [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Above and Beyond KM [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messing the managers : Easy Idiot - get better knowledge</title>
		<link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/02/control-freaks-need-not-apply.html/comment-page-1#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Messing the managers : Easy Idiot - get better knowledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/?p=569#comment-541</guid>
		<description>[...] the same sitting, I read Mary Abraham&#8217;s Control Freaks Need Not Apply&#160;about social media work and the general culture that has built up around the use of these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the same sitting, I read Mary Abraham&#8217;s Control Freaks Need Not Apply&nbsp;about social media work and the general culture that has built up around the use of these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Abraham</title>
		<link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/02/control-freaks-need-not-apply.html/comment-page-1#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/?p=569#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Samuel - 

KM definitely has a role to play in social media deployments, but I&#039;d characterize it (like you did) as a coordinating role rather than a controlling role.  We get into trouble when we forget this basic distinction.

- Mary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel &#8211; </p>
<p>KM definitely has a role to play in social media deployments, but I&#8217;d characterize it (like you did) as a coordinating role rather than a controlling role.  We get into trouble when we forget this basic distinction.</p>
<p>- Mary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/02/control-freaks-need-not-apply.html/comment-page-1#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/?p=569#comment-490</guid>
		<description>Nice post, Mary. Very true. What I also see happening in the company I work for is this. I&#039;m thinking of all kinds of things in the social media landscape I would like to set up for my colleagues. But then you hear it&#039;s already happening somewhere! What I also see is: it is nice to have one person or a group of people (KM department, K-manager) to keep track of these initiatives to learn from them and roll them out to general public. Yes, no or less control. But help with cultivating and general adoption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, Mary. Very true. What I also see happening in the company I work for is this. I&#8217;m thinking of all kinds of things in the social media landscape I would like to set up for my colleagues. But then you hear it&#8217;s already happening somewhere! What I also see is: it is nice to have one person or a group of people (KM department, K-manager) to keep track of these initiatives to learn from them and roll them out to general public. Yes, no or less control. But help with cultivating and general adoption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Abraham</title>
		<link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/02/control-freaks-need-not-apply.html/comment-page-1#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/?p=569#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Wendy - 

The term &quot;control freak&quot; may be excessively harsh.  However, the pattern of behavior (trying to limit manner of use based on worries about risk and abuse) is prevalent in many workplaces.  It might be helpful to identify what the real worries are and see if the social media tools really are the issue or if proper education of the user population might deal with the problem.

- Mary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy &#8211; </p>
<p>The term &#8220;control freak&#8221; may be excessively harsh.  However, the pattern of behavior (trying to limit manner of use based on worries about risk and abuse) is prevalent in many workplaces.  It might be helpful to identify what the real worries are and see if the social media tools really are the issue or if proper education of the user population might deal with the problem.</p>
<p>- Mary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Abraham</title>
		<link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/02/control-freaks-need-not-apply.html/comment-page-1#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Abraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/?p=569#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Mark - 

&quot;Control freakery&quot; is a great expression!  I agree that life inside the firewall is quite different than life outside.  However, our basic social and cooperative impulses as humans don&#039;t change as a result of where we are in relation to the firewall.  If anything, knowing that we&#039;re operating behind the firewall tends to make us more circumspect in our online interactions at the office.  As a result, I&#039;m not sure it is entirely necessary to tightly circumscribe how employees should use social media tools at work based on managerial worries about risk exposure or abuse.  On the other hand, I would use my resources to ensure users have the chance to exploit those tools.  The philosophy behind this is that restrictive rules set early in the process tend to limit the use of the tools to the vision of the project sponsor and limit the ability of users to stretch the tools in creative ways.  While we may never achieve the freewheeling approach of Craigslist, it would be a shame to cut ourselves off from the opportunity to allow our use of social tools to evolve in a way that truly responds to the needs to users.

This is not meant to promote a &quot;build it and they will come&quot; approach.  But, it does acknowledge the power of social media tools to change users as those users in turn change their use of the tools.  If you have a group within your firm that really wants the power of a social media tool to meet particular work goals, you&#039;re no longer foisting technology on them, but using technology to meet a real need.  When that technology is social, the users can be more creative.  We shouldn&#039;t get in the way of this creativity unnecessarily.

- Mary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; </p>
<p>&#8220;Control freakery&#8221; is a great expression!  I agree that life inside the firewall is quite different than life outside.  However, our basic social and cooperative impulses as humans don&#8217;t change as a result of where we are in relation to the firewall.  If anything, knowing that we&#8217;re operating behind the firewall tends to make us more circumspect in our online interactions at the office.  As a result, I&#8217;m not sure it is entirely necessary to tightly circumscribe how employees should use social media tools at work based on managerial worries about risk exposure or abuse.  On the other hand, I would use my resources to ensure users have the chance to exploit those tools.  The philosophy behind this is that restrictive rules set early in the process tend to limit the use of the tools to the vision of the project sponsor and limit the ability of users to stretch the tools in creative ways.  While we may never achieve the freewheeling approach of Craigslist, it would be a shame to cut ourselves off from the opportunity to allow our use of social tools to evolve in a way that truly responds to the needs to users.</p>
<p>This is not meant to promote a &#8220;build it and they will come&#8221; approach.  But, it does acknowledge the power of social media tools to change users as those users in turn change their use of the tools.  If you have a group within your firm that really wants the power of a social media tool to meet particular work goals, you&#8217;re no longer foisting technology on them, but using technology to meet a real need.  When that technology is social, the users can be more creative.  We shouldn&#8217;t get in the way of this creativity unnecessarily.</p>
<p>- Mary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/02/control-freaks-need-not-apply.html/comment-page-1#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/?p=569#comment-487</guid>
		<description>This, perhaps, helps to explain why governments are having such trouble with social media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This, perhaps, helps to explain why governments are having such trouble with social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gould</title>
		<link>http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/2009/02/control-freaks-need-not-apply.html/comment-page-1#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aboveandbeyondkm.com/?p=569#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Mary,

I think there is a difference between systems outside the firewall and those inside it. I agree that control freakery is inappropriate wherever you are, but more care needs to be take to nurture effective use inside the firewall -- &quot;build it and they will come&quot; is not a sensible approach.

Mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary,</p>
<p>I think there is a difference between systems outside the firewall and those inside it. I agree that control freakery is inappropriate wherever you are, but more care needs to be take to nurture effective use inside the firewall &#8212; &#8220;build it and they will come&#8221; is not a sensible approach.</p>
<p>Mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

