Let me begin with a health warning: Be careful as you watch the video below. It will give you a sympathy backache. That said, it’s worth watching it to see what a naturally gifted human pretzel can do.
Now think about how you might perform as a human pretzel. No matter how much physical flexibility you may have, chances are that you cannot come close to the standards that Victoria Jacoby attains in the video.
Actually, let me rephrase that. Chances are that you cannot come close to her ability to contort her body, but I’m willing to bet that you far exceed her accomplishments when it comes to contorting yourself and your technology to accomplish everything you need to do everyday.
A classic case in point is email. Its ubiquity is a testament to its perceived usefulness. However, I’d suggest that we have been pushing its usefulness beyond the boundaries of safety and sanity.
So what are smart and safe uses of email? Craig Jarrow of Time Management Ninja suggests the following:
- Non-urgent communication
- One-t0-many communications
- Sending documents/pictures
If those are the good uses, what are the bad uses? In 2007 Dave Pollard outlined the bad use cases in When NOT to Use Email:
- To communicate bad news, complaints or criticism
- When you are seeking information that is not simple and straight-forward
- When you are seeking approval on something that is involved or controversial
- When you are sending a few people complicated instructions
- When you are asking for comments on a long document
- To request information from a group on a recurring basis
- To convey instructions to a large number of people
- To achieve consensus
- To explore a subject or idea
- To send news, interesting documents, links, policies, directory updates and other “FYI” stuff.
For each of these cases, Dave Pollard provides what he considers to be the better way of communicating. (You can find a concise summary of the alternatives in his post, Getting Rid of Email.) In addition, he has created a detailed decision tree you can use to determine what mode of communication is best in each circumstance.
People are fond of saying that “Lawyers live in email.” A more accurate way of describing this is as follows: lawyers spend their days as human pretzels when it comes to email. They contort themselves and their technology, pushing it to do things it was never meant to do.
And then we get mad when things go wrong?
Perhaps it’s time we shifted from the bad use cases to the better use cases for email. Perhaps it’s time we finally outlawed pretzels — of the human and technological kind.