After my last post, True Productivity, Rees Morrison and I got into an interesting offline chat about whether the “Just do it” camp was wise to throw caution to the wind in order to get something (anything!) done. We agreed that the hard part of this action/caution equation was achieving a balance between the two. To do this right, you need to develop sufficient judgment so that you can act wisely AND efficiently.
Achieving a balance between action and caution isn’t something everyone does equally well. For most folks, it takes years of experience, good perspective and lots of common sense. Unfortunately, these are not taught in every school. To compound the problem, law schools, law departments and law firms have become so sensitized to the downside of most actions that actually taking a stance or making a decision can feel foolhardy at times.
At moments like these consider the case of Toyota’s lawyers, as recounted by Jay Shepherd in his post, How lawyers save the world…with disclaimers. While this example of lawyerly caution may strike you as ridiculous, have there been times when you’ve come close? When did you last say “out of an abundance of caution” or “for the avoidance of doubt” or “to be perfectly clear”? Chances are, it was at a point when you decided to carry out some redundant effort at the cost of productivity.
The next time you reach for a “belt-and-suspenders” solution, ask yourself if your caution is justified or whether it’s preventing productivity. If it’s the right thing to do, go ahead. If not, take (a tiny) walk on the wild side and tip the balance towards action.
[Photo Credit: Xiaming]